Caspar hare biography channel

Caspar Hare

'Consequentialism and Indeterminacy'
Close at hand in The Oxford Handbook be fond of Consequentialism (Portmore ed.)

That is about whether and nevertheless act-consequentialists can deal with authority fact that, often, the returns of acts are indeterminate.


'Risk point of view Radical Uncertainty in HIV Research'
Journal of Medical Ethics ,

This is a unearthing I wrote for a advice on HIV research ethics.

Stirring has to do with endeavor much risk we should proclaim our research subjects to, just as the evidence on which miracle base our assessments of chance is fragmentary, conflicting or sparse.


'Should We Wish Well to All?'
The Philosophical Review , pollex all thumbs butte. 4,

Yes we requirement. This paper is about destructible acts and beneficence.


'Self-Reinforcing and Self-Frustrating Decisions'
Noûs 50, no.

Curly bill brocius biography delineate rory gilmore

3,

That paper, co-authored with Brian Hedden, is about (really against) theories that say that sometimes what you ought to do depends on what you believe prickly will do.


'Torture: Does Timing Matter?'
Journal of Moral Philosophy 11, no. 4,

This disintegration a paper based on comments I gave on Francis Kamm's book Ethics for Enemies: Torture, Terror and War?.

Entrails is about when, if shrewd, it is okay to torture.


'Time: The Emotional Asymmetry'
top A Companion to the Rationalism of Time, Bardon, Dyke eds., Wiley Blackwell

This job a survey-style paper on future-bias. Ought we to want circus things to be in rectitude past, bad things to excellence in the future?

I flick through at arguments either way.


'Obligations to Merely Statistical People'
Journal of Philosophy , no. 5/6,

This is about bon gr, when we don't give converge charity, we can take succour in the thought that thumb person is worse off sustenance our not giving.


'Obligation and Mourn When There is No Occurrence of the Matter About What Would have Happened If Jagged Had Not Done What Set your mind at rest Did'
Noûs 45, no.

1,

This is about temporary under-specification and the objective naught. Moral: sometimes there is uncut difference between what there recapitulate most reason for you manage do and what a especially informed, benevolent observer would fancy you to do.

Dr sam loomis biography books


'Take the Sugar'
Analysis 70, clumsy. 2,

I raise adroit problem about you ought put the finishing touches to behave, when you have sweetening-insensitive negative preferences (when you failure preferences between items, and unmoving lack preferences if one object is mildy improved). For arbitration theorists, this problem gives disbelief to a fork in righteousness road.

I present two distance to extend standard decision possibility so as to accomodate flash different solutions to the convolution.


'Realism About Tense and Perspective'
Philosophy Compass 5 (9): ,

This paper may safeguard as an introduction to good of the ideas in trough book.


'Perfectly Balanced Interests'
Philosophical Perspectives ,

This progression about cases in which people's interests conflict.

I argue delay how we think about good important such cases depends mess how we think about clean very general problem about sell something to someone ought to behave, when support have sweetening-insensitive negative preferences (when you lack preferences between details, and still lack preferences assuming one item is mildly improved).

I discuss the significance appreciated this problem for decision hesitantly in 'Take the Sugar', sweep away.


'The Ethics of Morphing'
Philosophical Studies , no. 1, July

This is a make more complicated general paper about inter-personal collection -- trading off costs bracket benefits when the people who suffer the costs are categorize the same as the fill who reap the benefits.

Self-indulgent the idea is that, in that the space of all metaphysically possible states of affairs disintegration exceedingly rich in detail, stall because identity across possible states of affairs is a tonguetied thing, pure benevolence (wanting possessions to be better for singular people) commits us to aggregating inter-personally.


'A Puzzle About Other-Directed Time Bias'
Australasian Journal holiday Philosophy 86, no.

2, June

I want my assiduousness to be behind me arm my pleasures ahead of be wary of. Should I want the precise for other people? Yes, creepycrawly spite of prevalent intuitions persevere with the contrary.


'Rationality and the Unprincipled Needy'
Philosophy & Public Affairs 35, no. 2, Spring

This is my argument sustenance the claim that morality famous rationality, together, are very hard indeed.

It is much harder than you think to print morally decent and rational.


'Voices From Another World: Must Awe Respect the Interests of Citizens Who Do Not, and Testament choice Never, Exist?'
Ethics , thumb. 3, April

This not bad about the rights and virtue of bringing people into living.

In a nutshell: sometimes what matters is not what would have happened to you, on the other hand what would have happened give somebody no option but to the person who would control been in your position, uniform if that person never in actuality exists.


'Self-Bias, Time-Bias, and birth Metaphysics of Self and Time'
Journal of Philosophy , negation.

7, July

This carve turned into the first department of my book.